Episode 215: Touch My Pink Monkey

Episode 215: Touch My Pink Monkey

Very Bad Wizards

David and Tamler argue about the philosopher L.A. Paul’s ideas on “transformative experiences” – big life decisions that will change you and your values so much that our normal decision-making models break down. Tamler is fully on board and hopeful for philosophy, but David sees Paul’s view as a threat to his precious rationality. Plus, we tackle the greatest existential threat to human civilization in history: critical race theory. Why are people on all sides so intent on misunderstanding it? Sponsored By: Wine.com: Wine.com is an American wine online retailer that offers the largest selection of wines in the world. Wine.com sells over 2 million bottles per year, with a stock of more than 17,000 different bottles of wine, shipping throughout the United States. Sign up now, and as a list
0
(-)
Rate this episode:

Episode mentions

People mentions

Reviews

    No reviews yet, be the first!

Transcript

SpeakerA
0m 0s
-
0m 17s

Very Bad Wizards is a podcast with a philosopher, my dad, and psychologist Dave Pizarro, having an informal discussion about issues in science and ethics. Please note that the discussion contains bad words that I'm not allowed to say and knowing my dad, some very inappropriate jokes.

SpeakerB
0m 17s
-
0m 24s

Hey, those are vampires. You don't get to insult them. You're not a vampire.

SpeakerA
0m 28s
-
1m 8s

The great and Oz has spoken. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. Who are you? Who are you? A very bad man. I'm a very good man. Good man. They think deep thoughts and with no more brains than you have. Pay no attention to that man. Anybody can have a brain. You're a very bad man.

SpeakerB
1m 8s
-
1m 30s

I'm a very good man. Just a very bad wizard. Welcome to very bad wizards. I'm Tamer Summers from the University of Houston. Dave from Twitter to Fox News to most state legislatures, everyone is worked up about critical race theory. So let me ask you, how has critical race theory hurt you and your loved ones?

SpeakerC
1m 31s
-
1m 36s

My self esteem has dropped dramatically since I learned that I might be white.

SpeakerB
1m 37s
-
1m 39s

Yeah, no.

SpeakerC
1m 39s
-
1m 53s

You know how it's affected me the most is that CRT in my little niche of psychology stands for Cognitive Reflection Task. It's like a particular measure that people use a lot, right? And now it's just meaningless. That's how it's harmed me directly.

SpeakerB
1m 53s
-
1m 55s

Arguably, it was meaningless as a measure.

SpeakerC
1m 55s
-
1m 58s

Before that's only because you got them all wrong.

SpeakerB
2m 1s
-
2m 10s

So today we are going to wade into the debate over critical race theory, I guess something we're both experts in.

SpeakerC
2m 10s
-
2m 22s

Yes, a big caveat. Just remember that this is segment one, because we got a little bit of flack for our loosey goosey treatment of the lab leak theory, which was a.

SpeakerB
2m 22s
-
2m 35s

Fucking opening question, people. And they attributed to us this was on Reddit. They attributed it to us like some strong, firm stance on the lab leak. What the fuck?

SpeakerC
2m 35s
-
2m 41s

I know. One dear editor was like, did they not read this paper? And then they put, like, a nature paper.

SpeakerB
2m 41s
-
2m 48s

He's like, I'm surprised they didn't mention this paper for an opening question. Little thing to riff about.

SpeakerC
2m 48s
-
3m 2s

I honestly, honestly had zero readings ever done on the Lavlic theory, which maybe is irresponsible, but like you said, it was an open question. I didn't even know it was going to be a segment.

SpeakerB
3m 2s
-
3m 14s

It was like the ghost thing. Also, where on Reddit, for the first, like, 30 comments, that's all anybody was talking about. Didn't we talk about it for, like, five minutes or something?

SpeakerC
3m 14s
-
3m 33s

I don't know. I don't even remember. But what I do remember is it's not even clear to me whether the lab leak hypothesis in my mind was an accidental leak or whether it was some malicious intent or don't take any of that seriously.

SpeakerB
3m 33s
-
3m 53s

Yeah, no, definitely not from me either. I thought it was a funny opening question just because everybody was talking actually, I think the reason I was laughing when I came up with the idea to do it, which was right on the spot, is because of how uninformed we were about I thought we made that clear.

SpeakerC
3m 53s
-
3m 56s

That should be the real disclaimer that Liza starts the episode with.

SpeakerB
3m 56s
-
3m 60s

Yeah, they don't know what the fuck they never have.

SpeakerC
4m 0s
-
4m 6s

Like I said, I know about four things, and we covered that territory a long time ago.

SpeakerB
4m 6s
-
4m 25s

By episode nine, we had covered all the things we know and now it's all just bullshit. Right. I will say that I did do a little more reading about critical race theory. And we also have something funny to talk about, which I guess relates to critical race theory, although I think it doesn't.

SpeakerC
4m 26s
-
4m 28s

The tangential relation is part of the.

SpeakerB
4m 28s
-
5m 1s

Discussion, perhaps, which is a paper called it sounds like one of our things that we did for Journal of Controversial Ideas. The abstract on having whiteness. Yeah, whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has a malignant, parasitic like condition to which, quote, white people have a particular susceptibility. That's the first sentence of the abstract. So we're going to talk a little bit about that paper because it was the target of some ire.

SpeakerC
5m 1s
-
5m 14s

Yes. And then in the second segment, we are talking about the philosopher L. A. Paul's book. I'm doing air quotes on book because we didn't read the book.

SpeakerB
5m 14s
-
5m 15s

White people.

SpeakerC
5m 17s
-
5m 22s

On transformative experiences. Transformative Experience, I guess is the title of the book.

SpeakerB
5m 22s
-
5m 39s

Read some we prepared I actually downloaded the book and read a chunk of it. But then yes, also the Pro C was very helpful and it is a very simple idea that I'm excited to talk about because I think it's simple, but then also profound and true.

SpeakerC
5m 41s
-
5m 43s

And also sometimes wrong. So we'll talk about that.

SpeakerB
5m 43s
-
5m 52s

Yeah, well, Dave provoked a violent opposition kind of animosity I thought you liked Paul, too.

SpeakerC
5m 52s
-
6m 10s

So lori, Paul is my friend. Don't say anything about to just I want to load my objection. I would lodge not load my objection here to talking about any of this stuff. I feel like we have to but I resent it all the way.

SpeakerB
6m 10s
-
6m 13s

Right. This is your fault, listeners.

SpeakerC
6m 13s
-
6m 27s

I resent having to talk about critical race theory. I wanted to ask you sorry, just quickly, I wanted to ask you, have you ever taken one of those 23 ANDME or any of the how white are you?

SpeakerB
6m 27s
-
6m 29s

I haven't because I feel like this.

SpeakerC
6m 29s
-
6m 33s

Is just an empirical question. The degree of evilness that one has.

SpeakerB
6m 33s
-
6m 53s

Could be directly yeah, no, I think I'm mostly non white. If you look like I haven't done the actual DNA analysis, but I think I'm like one quarter white. I think, like two fifths. And I don't know how the math worked out, but two fifth Native American.

SpeakerC
6m 54s
-
6m 56s

Cherokee, probably Cherokee, possibly.

SpeakerB
6m 56s
-
7m 8s

Yeah. Two ninths black, and then obviously some Ashkenazi Jew, but no sephardic.

SpeakerC
7m 8s
-
7m 10s

I heard you saying clearly.

SpeakerB
7m 12s
-
7m 25s

I would love to be sephardic. All Asanazi dudes have sephardic envy. Who wouldn't want to be a little cooler, a little tougher, a little Mediterranean, right?

SpeakerC
7m 26s
-
7m 28s

You should do like a 23 ANDME.

SpeakerB
7m 30s
-
7m 40s

Yeah, but then I would learn that I'm not related to most of the people I think I'm related to. Did you do one?

SpeakerC
7m 41s
-
8m 5s

Yeah, I did a National Geographic one years ago and it was mostly expected. I have a lot of so a quarter of my family is Lebanese, so there's Mediterranean that goes back there. But it came out like around 20% native American, so indigenous South American. So I feel like I get to say some things that you're not allowed.

SpeakerB
8m 5s
-
8m 9s

To say as we talk about a couple of your white ancestors raped.

SpeakerC
8m 10s
-
8m 18s

It's like the battle is in my own genes. I don't know what to believe. Do I identify with the rapists or the rape?

SpeakerB
8m 18s
-
8m 22s

Exactly question we all have to ask ourselves.

SpeakerC
8m 23s
-
8m 29s

I laugh to keep from crying. All right, so should we start with on having whiteness or should we start with critical race theory?

SpeakerB
8m 29s
-
8m 42s

Well, I was going to ask you a serious question, or somewhat serious depending on how relative to what we've been talking about. If somebody asked you what is critical race theory, what would you say?

SpeakerC
8m 43s
-
9m 33s

Yeah, it's the exact right question and it's one that I was asking Nikki and Bella. So my answer would be would have been critical race theory is this is the naive ish answer that it is a loose field of study about how institutional structures have particularly affected people of a certain race. Right. So the notion that there is structural racism and that identifying the sources of those structures and institutions is a way to get rid of some of the nefarious, creepy racism of the country and even that's more educated than I probably could have given you like 24 hours ago. Right.

SpeakerB
9m 35s
-
9m 60s

We've talked about it a lot on the show, mostly just making fun of the panic about critical race theory from people like former guest of the podcast James Lindsay. But but I had always associated it with just critical theory in general, which has kind of Marxist elements and related to feminist critique of rights, feminists like standpoint epistemology. But

To see the rest of the transcript, you must sign in