#1596 - Avi Loeb

#1596 - Avi Loeb

The Joe Rogan Experience

Professor Avi Loeb is a theoretical physicist whose areas of professional interest include cosmology and astrophysics. His new book, "Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth", proposes that 'Oumuamua, the interstellar object that passed through our solar system in 2017, may have been the creation of an alien intelligence. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
0
(-)
Rate this episode:

Episode mentions

People mentions

Reviews

    No reviews yet, be the first!

Transcript

SpeakerA
0m 2s
-
0m 6s

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out. The Joe Rogan experience.

SpeakerB
0m 6s
-
0m 7s

Train by day.

SpeakerA
0m 7s
-
0m 10s

Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day.

SpeakerB
0m 14s
-
0m 16s

Hello, Abby.

SpeakerA
0m 16s
-
0m 17s

Thanks for having me.

SpeakerB
0m 17s
-
0m 24s

My pleasure. I'm very good friends with your friend Lex Friedman, and he highly recommends you as well.

SpeakerA
0m 24s
-
0m 39s

Oh, thank you. You. He asked me about social media, and I told him I have no footprint on social media. He said, why? And I said, I promised my wife when I married her not to have any account. And he said I should get married.

SpeakerB
0m 41s
-
0m 48s

Yeah, he reads accounts. He says he doesn't, but then he does. He reads, like, comments and stuff, and then he gets mad at things people say. It's kind of funny.

SpeakerA
0m 48s
-
0m 52s

You see, I save the time. I don't even read what other people say.

SpeakerB
0m 52s
-
0m 52s

Good.

SpeakerA
0m 52s
-
0m 55s

And I don't care how many likes I have. That's the other thing.

SpeakerB
0m 55s
-
0m 57s

That's wonderful. That's a freedom.

SpeakerA
0m 57s
-
0m 57s

Yeah.

SpeakerB
0m 57s
-
1m 30s

That's an underrated freedom. Yeah. You came on my radar when you were discussing Amuamua. Is that what I said? That's the right amuamua, which is an object that we detected in space that you believe could possibly have been extraterrestrial in origin. Meaning from some sort of a civilization, right? Yeah. Please explain to people what a muamua is, why it's so extraordinary, and why you think it's possible that it came from some other intelligent civilization.

SpeakerA
1m 30s
-
7m 8s

Right. So I'm a scientist, and I basically follow the evidence, just like Sherlock Holmes trying to find solutions. It's a detective story. You have some anomalies, some things that don't quite match what you expected, and you're trying to find an explanation. And the thing about Oumuamua is that it was discovered on October 19, 2017, a little more than three years ago. And it was the very first object that visited our vicinity in the solar system from outside the solar system. It moved too fast to be bound to the sun. Very first object that we have found coming to us from interstellar space, from other places. And at first, astronomers said, oh, yeah, it's probably just like the objects we had in our solar system, all the rocks that we have seen before, we have seen comets and asteroids. So a comet is a rock that is covered with ice, water ice. So when it gets close to the sun, the surface gets warmed up, and the ice turns into vapor gas. And you see this beautiful cometary tail behind it. That's what a comet is. An asteroid is just rock without much ice on it. Actually, the first person to explain what comets are was at Harvard, the university that I am affiliated with. And the story goes that, I mean, it was Fred Whipple that he went to Harvard Square and saw all the slush during the winter, know, and came up with the idea that it's just icy rock or icy rocks, know, rocky ice. And that's what a comet is. And the comets come to us from the periphery of the solar system. And astronomers said, okay, other stars may have them as well. And since they are loosely bound, if they are in the periphery, they can be easily ripped apart from their host star, and some of them will fly in our direction. We will see them. So they said, oumuamua is probably a comet. The only problem is there wasn't any cometry tail. So you look for a duck, but it doesn't look like a duck. So then the question is, what is it? And so people said, okay, it's just a rock without any ice on it. Then the problem was that it exhibited an extra push away from the sun. And usually you get it from the rocket effect. When you make the cometary tail, it pushes the object in the opposite direction, just like a jet plane. A jet plane works by throwing gas out, and that's pushing you forward. So a comet has an extra push when it evaporates. But there was no cometary tail, so why did it show an extra push? That was the key question in my mind, at which point I started thinking, maybe it's not a comet and not an asteroid. Something else. And the other strange thing about it, it changes its brightness by a factor of ten or more. And the brightness of the object, the light that we see, is simply reflected sunlight. So just think about it. Think about a piece of paper, razor thin piece of paper, tumbling in the wind and changing the area that we can see, the projected area of that piece of paper by a factor of ten as we look at it. That's exactly what we inferred from this object spinning around every 8 hours, but changing its brightness by a factor of ten, meaning that the area projected on the sky that we see that reflects sunlight changed by a factor of ten. So that means it has an extreme geometry, most likely flat, if you try to interpret the light that it reflected over as it was tumbling around. And so a flat object about the size of a football field, that has an extra push. If it were a comet, it needed to lose about a 10th of its weight. So a lot of evaporation, you can't just say, oh, it's a little bit of evaporation, and therefore that's why we don't see it. It should have lost a 10th of its weight. If we go on a diet and lose a 10th of our weight, that's a big chunk of mass, right? So this object didn't lose that because we didn't see it. And the Spitzel space telescope looked very deeply behind it to see if there are any traces of dust or gas. Didn't see then, you know, just like Sherlock Holmes, I was trying to think, together with a postdoc of mine, Schmuel Biali, what could explain it? And the only thing that came to mind is reflecting sunlight. So the object itself is being pushed by the sunlight reflecting off its surface. And that would agree with everything we know about the object. But in order for it to work, the object needs to be very thin, like a sail, the sail on a boat. So a sail is pushed by a wind, but you can also push an object, a thin object, by light, and that is called the light sail. And we're actually using this technology now, developing it for space exploration. The big advantage is you don't need to carry the fuel with the spacecraft. You just reflect light off it, and it's being pushed.

SpeakerB
7m 8s
-
7m 13s

Now, science fiction movie that did something like that, I think it was called sunlight, quite possibly.

SpeakerA
7m 13s
-
9m 25s

I should mention an anecdote in September, just a few months ago, in September 2020, there was another object that showed an extra push, no cometary tail. And then astronomer. So astronomers gave it a name, 2020. So, okay, September 2020. And then they extrapolated back in time and found that it came from Earth, actually. And then they looked at the history books and saw that, indeed, there was a rocket booster from a lunar lander that was kicked into space. And this is the object. Now, why did it show this push? Because it's a hollow, it's a very thin structure. So here is an example where we can tell it's artificial, and we know that we made it. But Oumuamua could not have been made by us, because it was passing near us just for a few months, very quickly, faster than any rocket that we can launch. That's why we couldn't really chase it when it was receding away from us, and it came from outside the solar system. So I just do, one plus one equal two. I say, okay, it looks very peculiar. Maybe it belongs to another civilization. I just put it in a scientific paper. I didn't think. We didn't have any press release. Then it went viral. The public got extremely interested. And the thing that really surprised me is that my colleagues were pushing back. They were very upset that this possibility was even mentioned. We had a seminar, a lecture, about this object at Harvard. And a colleague of mine, after the lecture, said, this object is really weird. I wish it never existed. Now, to me, I was really appalled by this. How can you say something like that? You should be happy about whatever nature gives you. You learn something new. If something doesn't look right, it actually teaches us. It's a learning experience. We learn that we have to revise the way we think about reality. That's a good thing. That's not a bad. You shouldn't always be in your comfort zone and think that the future will be the same as the past. So I actually see it as a blessing.

SpeakerB
9m 25s
-
9m 32s

I can't imagine why anybody would be upset that it exists. Like I wish it didn't exist. That's kind of hilarious, because it takes.

SpeakerA
9m 32s
-
9m 35s

You away from your comfort zone, I.

SpeakerB
9m 35s
-
9m 46s

Know, but if you're studying the heavens, you're studying the cosmos. What is the ultimate thing that you could find? Another civilization or a piece of something? Another civilization.

SpeakerA
9m 46s
-
10m 0s

That's exactly my point. But if you go back in time, let me give you two examples. Galileo Galile said, I think the earth moves around the sun. But at the time, philosophers knew

To see the rest of the transcript, you must sign in